South Stoke plateau is saved. At least, for now...

In March 2025, a Public Inquiry into the future of South Stoke plateau dismissed an appeal by the prospective developers to build 290 houses here.

See below for details

The Hignett Family Trust's appeal against B&NES Planning Committee decision not to approve their proposed development has been dismissed by the Planning Inspector hearing evidence at the Public Inquiry held in January 2025.

The full 28 page report is available here.

This is a major achievement for all of us - the many, many people who have been working so hard over the last three years to fight this proposed excessive development. We send huge thanks to everyone, too numerous to mention by name, who have contributed specialist knowledge, delivered leaflets and generally spread the word and built up the support of the community. Thanks also to the hundreds of sponsors providing funds that enabled the Parish Councils – supported by SOBA – to play an active part at the appeal, put forward our case and have the community’s voice heard.

The Hignett Family Trust’s (HFT) application to build 290 more houses on the plateau was almost unanimously rejected by the B&NES Planning Committee in April 2024 following over a thousand public objections. Despite this, HFT appealed to the national Planning Inspectorate to overturn B&NES’s decision. An Inquiry sat for 7 days starting in late January 2025, and the Inspector published his Appeal Decision report on Friday 14th March.

Line 1 of this report is ‘The appeal is dismissed’. We won!

We know HFT will be back with a revised proposal, so SOBA’s work will continue. This latest decision will significantly constrain the extent of any development and the number of additional houses that can be built. It should also see off the plans that HFT have to develop the whole plateau across to the Cross Keys.

What does the report say?

There were three areas which contributed to the dismissal of the appeal by the Inspector: the impact on the Cotswold National Landscape, the impact on heritage assets and the extent of mixed use.

The negative impact on the Cotswold National Landscape was the decisive factor and was given the most weight by the Inspector. The entire site lies within the Cotswold National Landscape (CNL), which was formerly known as the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The Inspector stressed the landscape value of the plateau and its contribution to the CNL’s special qualities. He was critical of the current phase 1 development which ‘is very conspicuous on the skyline which previously would have been largely undeveloped.’

His view was that the new development as proposed (Phases 3 and 4) would have too great a visual impact from within the CNL and ‘it is unlikely that any amount of suitable planting would be sufficient to visually screen the housing during the day or night.’ As a result ‘It would not avoid a detrimental impact on the CNL.’

The other two areas where he considered there would be a negative impact, but of lesser weight, were the impact on heritage assets and the extent to which the development was, or was not, mixed use. Neither of these on their own would have been decisive but they are factors that need to be considered when weighing up the pros and cons of the development (the ‘Planning Balance’).

The Inspector did not uphold our objections on the impact of traffic, and accepted the view of B&NES Highways Authority that the developer’s traffic modelling was acceptable. This is deeply frustrating as we feel our arguments and evidence were convincing and we know the traffic at peak times in this area is already a major issue.

Despite these caveats the dismissal is a terrific result that demonstrates what can be achieved by such a huge community effort.

Many, many thanks for all your support.

Best wishes - SoBA

It is not expected that the Inspector will make his decision known until several weeks after the end of the Inquiry.

Attending the Inquiry

We are not planning a protest before the meeting as that would be inappropriate on this occasion. If you wish to attend the Inquiry in person then please e-mail planning_appeals@bathnes.gov.uk with your name and why you are interested in attending. The Inquiry will also be live streamed and can be watched here.

As was the case at both Planning Committee meetings, it is important that attendees are respectful and listen to all the arguments without interruption.

Speakers at the Inquiry

There is the opportunity to speak at the Inquiry, as there was at the Planning Committee. Given the level of interest, the Planning Inspector has asked us to coordinate with other objectors to avoid repetition but also to ensure that the local community’s views are represented. SOBA, the Parish and the Ward Councillors will endeavour to do this.

If you have any queries, please contact us at info@soba.org.uk .

A widely unpopular & flawed development

A planning application has been submitted to build 290 new houses on the South Stoke Plateau. This comes on top of the 171 that are already being built there. This area simply will not accommodate such a massive increase in additional houses.

This is agricultural land that used to be within the green belt and is subject to strict planning laws. We believe these laws must be followed.

Objections to this application have been made by: Cotswold National Landscape, Bath Preservation Trust, Avon Gardens Trust, Campaign to Protect Rural England, all local Parish Councils, B&NES ward councillors, Wera Hobhouse MP for Bath & over 1,500 members of the community.

We believe that the council should view this application for the plateau as a litmus test for future proposed developments around which are either in, or next to, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and/or the designated World Heritage Site.

We believe the Planning Department should conduct such applications with greater objectivity. The potential damage of permitting such unworthy developments is incalculable.

We recognise that new and particularly affordable houses need to be built - but they must be built in the right place and be sustainable. This proposed development is in the wrong place - not only destroying vital green spaces but will be car dependent and cause total traffic chaos.

The argument that the need for new houses means that all developments should be approved regardless of major flaws is clearly nonsensical. Applications for new developments must be judged on their own individual merits and only located in areas that can clearly support them.

This isn't 'nimbyism'
A major challenge for B&NES

Why we oppose this development

Traffic chaos - total gridlock
An Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

As planned, the development will be heavily car dependent and with access via the Odd Down Park & Ride roundabout, threatens to bring total gridlock to the already chronically congested roads in the area. The A367 approach to this roundabout is already a notorious bottleneck and it's not unusual to see traffic queuing all the way back to Peasedown.

The application states that the additional houses and associated traffic generated would result in a maximum wait time at this junction of 15 seconds (!). Ask anyone familiar with this commute and they will tell you that this claim is nonsense and self-evidently not credible. Our own traffic survey found current wait times at the junction up to 12 minutes.

And remember that these are current wait times - the additional vehicles delivered by the development would make the current chaos far worse.

Should this development be permitted, there will be a total of 461 new households. How much traffic & congestion do we think they will create by school runs and commutes, all entering the road network at a single point?

Severe congestion and tailbacks are a problem not only for traffic at Bath city junctions, but also for surrounding villages which are already suffering with drivers using country lanes not designed for modern rush hour traffic as rat runs.

It would be irresponsible and wholly unacceptable for B&NES to permit this development in the light of such overwhelming evidence of the harm it would cause. The area is simply not able to accommodate this many new homes and the resulting increased traffic.

The plateau is in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and is next to Green Belt land. As such it is subject to strict rules that condition any proposed development. These rules exist to protect the landscape and any application should meet them. We believe the application fails to do this and should therefore be refused.

National planning rules state that housing developments proposed in AONB should be refused other than in "exceptional circumstances". The exceptional circumstances do not exist that would justify this over development.

When the land was taken out of Green Belt, it meant that B&NES would receive applications for development. Importantly, the Planning Inspector stated that the total number of houses that could be built on the Plateau should be "around 300". The proposed development of 290 new houses, added to the 171 already under construction is a total of 461 - way more than the Inspector's projected number.

As of 2024, B&NES are also ahead of their housing delivery targets, confirming that there are no "exceptional circumstances" that justify such excessive development.

Devastating ecological damage & impact on wildlife
Threatens Wansdyke Scheduled Ancient Monument

A recently published State of Nature Report reveals plummeting British wildlife with 1 in 6 species at risk of extinction. As a result, the UK is now one of the most nature-depleted countries on Earth.

Instead of developing precious green spaces, we should be protecting them. Homebuilding should be prioritised on brownfield sites, of which there are many in Bath; capacity for 2,579 potential dwellings have been identified by B&NES Planning Department on their latest register.

We all need our green spaces not only for our own good health but also to protect wildlife, birds and insects and to maintain biodiversity. Landowners and developers must put need before greed.

The development threatens the stability of the Scheduled Ancient Wansdyke Monument which is currently 'at risk'. The Wansdyke is an ancient bank and ditch earthwork that runs for around 20km in an east–west direction, cutting through the landscape of Bath.

The application proposes an unlit foot and cycle path crossing over the Wansdyke which could cause major erosion of the monument. Any such path requires consent from Historic England, which has not yet been granted and remains uncertain. Any alternative path has not been identified and could compromise the Green Belt.

"permission should be refused for major developments in these designated areas except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated they are in the public interest"

Our instagram feed

View, comment or share all our socials here:

Make your voice heard,
email your councillor now...